Market prices, indices, notices
Used for index levels, closing data, company announcements, trading notices, and market-level verification.
Equity Mechanism by Jamil Research is built on source discipline. The publication prefers official data, company filings, and primary market sources before interpretation. If a claim cannot be supported, it is removed, labelled, or left unpublished.
Every research note starts by asking a simple question: where did the figure come from? A number from an official filing is treated differently from a number repeated in market commentary. Higher-quality evidence always takes priority.
PSX, company filings, NCCPL, SBP, PBS, Finance Division, SECP, official notices, and regulatory releases. These are the preferred sources for published figures.
Industry associations, broker research, IMF, World Bank, and recognised institutional material. These are used for context when primary data is unavailable or incomplete.
Reputable financial media may be used for background or event context, but not as the final authority for core figures when official data is available.
Social media, forums, anonymous claims, screenshots without a source trail, and unsourced commentary are not treated as evidence for published analysis.
Used for index levels, closing data, company announcements, trading notices, and market-level verification.
Used for FIPI/LIPI, client-type flows, sector flow checks, and participant behaviour analysis.
Used for earnings, balance sheets, cash flows, receivables, circular-debt exposure, dividends, and material information.
Used for policy rates, monetary indicators, yields, external account data, and banking-system context.
Used for CPI, sector price indices, economic statistics, and macro data that affects purchasing power and margins.
Used for Finance Division, SECP, OGRA, NEPRA, and other official policy or regulatory material when relevant.
A figure is not automatically publishable because it appears in a file. It must be checked for source, period, label, direction, and context. This matters especially in PSX data, where one-off transactions, stale figures, or mislabeled categories can change the interpretation.
Institutional flow data is useful, but it can be distorted by one-off transactions.
If a flow category appears unusually concentrated in one sector or one transaction pattern, it may reflect a block trade or stake transfer rather than organic market positioning.
If a flow looks like a one-off transaction, it should not be used as the headline explanation for market behaviour.
A category excluded from the written explanation should also be excluded from infographics and charts. Visuals must follow approved analysis, not raw files alone.
When flow interpretation is uncertain, the uncertainty should be visible. The reader should know whether the data reflects positioning or a possible technical transaction.
If PSX, SBP, PBS, NCCPL, SECP, or a company filing differs from market commentary, the official source is preferred.
Conflicting sources are not averaged to create a convenient middle number. The source difference must be resolved or the figure should not be used.
If a dashboard figure or article figure is source-dated rather than live, the page should say so clearly.
If a figure is missing, unavailable, or ambiguous, it is not guessed. It is either omitted or published only after verification.
Articles and graphics should show the source base clearly, especially when using market data, flow data, company filings, or macro releases.
When an interpretation depends on an assumption, the assumption should be stated in plain English.
A good explanation should identify what would weaken it: a policy reversal, flow change, earnings miss, commodity shock, or data revision.
If a material issue is found, it should be corrected. Readers can report data issues through the website feedback link.